Having talked to them extensively
about their plans and reasons, I found it ironic that the article mentioned
nearly none of the most relevant factors. Not a peep about the steep taxes that
essentially force many retirees to choose betwe
en maintaining a house and having
enough money to enjoy their retirement via travel. No mention of the ludicrous
code laws that make “tiny houses” and other realistic options for independent
and low-maintenance living illegal in many states. (But which can often be
avoided through use of a mobile small home such as an RV.) No discussion of the
absurd laws and taxes regulating employment options that make flexible, part-time,
on-the-books positions often more expensive for everyone than they’re worth.
(Despite the fact that many organizations would deeply benefit from access to
experienced hands as much as individuals would benefit from the extra income!)
I know there are many other
realities at play here, but I can’t help but think how wise it would be for
states to acknowledge trends like this and respond accordingly. Even small
changes – like being “tiny house” friendly – could serve a state very well by making
it a popular home base for well educated, well-traveled seniors. Think of the economic
benefits of that!
Until such time as states decide
to demonstrate so wisdom and self-control, however, I will wish my friends the
best in the endeavor and hope that when the time comes they are able to sell
their house without delay and embark on a new adventure worthy of the many
years’ hard work they put into earning it.
No comments:
Post a Comment